Was Kahane right?

This is not a post that I wanted to write. I don’t want to face a very troubling reality. But reality, by definition, is the thing you can’t escape.

Recently Israel held municipal elections, for mayors and city council members. In Haifa, the Labor Party candidate (it insists that it’s now called the “Zionist Union,” but as you will see, that is a misnomer), Dr. Einat Kalisch-Rotem was elected.

Kalisch-Rotem (48) is an architect with a doctorate in urban planning. She owns an architectural firm and also lectures at major universities in Israel. She is the first female mayor of one of Israel’s major cities. For what it’s worth, her Wikipedia entry claims that she has a black belt in karate.

She must not be a stupid person. And yet she appointed Raja Za’atara, an Arab citizen of Israel representing the Hadash (communist) party as one of two Deputy Mayors.

Za’atara said that Hamas is not a terrorist organization, because “An occupied nation has the right to resist the occupation.”  He said in an interview that “he would rather forfeit his salary than condemn Hamas,” and that he would not take part in memorial ceremonies for IDF soldiers. He said (Hebrew video) that ISIS had learned its crimes from the Zionist movement, which engaged in “Rape, looting, murder and massacres” in 1948. He has “expressed support on his social media pages for Hezbollah, Syrian president Bashar Assad and North Korea.” In 2012, he founded (Hebrew link) an organization to promote boycott, divestment, and sanctions of Israel (BDS), and worked to prevent Arab youth signing up for military or national service.

Of course all of Za’atara’s statements fall into the category of permitted speech. It is not a criminal offense in Israel to call for the end of the Jewish state or even to express support for organizations or countries with whom the state is at war. But nevertheless, he certainly should not hold political office, elected or appointed.

He’s not alone. Many of the Arab members of the Knesset share similar opinions. One of them, Basel Ghattas, is currently serving a two-year sentence for smuggling cellular telephones to security prisoners in an Israeli prison. Haneen Zoabi, who participated in the 2010 flotilla to Gaza which ended with the violent conflict on the Turkish vessel Mavi Marmara, will tell anyone who listens that Jews do not have a right of self-determination, but Palestinians do.

In 1988, Rabbi Meir Kahane was prevented from running for the Knesset by an amendment to Israel’s Basic Law: The Knesset, which bans anyone guilty of one of the following, explicitly or implicitly by his or her words or actions:

  1. negation of the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state;
  2. incitement to racism;
  3. support of armed struggle, by a hostile state or a terrorist organization, against the State of Israel.

This clause has never been applied to anyone else, not even Zoabi (although numerous MKs have argued that it should be).

Kahane believed and said that there was no possibility of coexistence between Israel’s Jewish majority and its Arab minority, and that Jewish survival required that the Arabs leave. He believed that the Arabs would never accept the idea of a Jewish state, and that they would eventually overwhelm the Jews demographically. Although the latter scenario seems much less likely today, as the Jewish birthrate increases and that of the Arabs declines, the political estrangement between them is today no better than in Kahane’s day.

I would like to believe that as time passes, Israel’s Arab citizens will become more accepting of the Jewish state, and more prepared to live as a minority – an extremely pampered one, by world standards – in it. But the opposite seems to be happening. Their demand for a “secular, democratic state” which always includes a right of return for millions of “Palestinian refugees” is equivalent to a demand to turn Israel into another Muslim Arab state. And if the 22 existing Muslim Arab states plus the Palestinian Authority and Gaza are any example, it would not long be secular or democratic, and would soon contain few if any Jews.

One wants to ask them, if they so much want to live in an Arab state, why aren’t they emigrating to one of the those? The answer is obvious: it’s much better here.

This illustrates the cognitive dissonance inherent in their position. Israeli Arab intellectuals know that the Arab states in the region are by and large failures. Their economies are poor, health and educational systems are sub-par, they are unstable and violent, and they are mostly dictatorships, even if they pretend to be democratic. They know all this, but still they find living as a minority in a Jewish state intolerable.

But what about the supposed majority of Arabs, who just want to work hard, raise their kids, and retire to sit on the porch of one of those massive castles one sees in Israeli Arab towns? Unfortunately, they vote for the parties of Haneen Zoabi, Basel Ghattas, Jamal Zahalka, Azmi Bishara (who fled the country to avoid prosecution for aiding Hezbollah during the 2006 war), and other militant anti-Zionists. Keep in mind that we are talking about Israel here, not the territories. In Israel there is a secret ballot, and PLO or Hamas operatives will not punish an Israeli Arab for voting “incorrectly.” If moderation doesn’t sell in Israeli Arab politics, it’s because nobody’s buying.

You will not find any Israeli Arab politicians – nor Arab citizens on the street – who do not insist that the creation of Israel was a historic wrong, a nakba for them for which the Arabs bore absolutely no responsibility. You will not find one who does not believe that all 5 million Palestinians with refugee status have a right of return. And you won’t find one that doesn’t think that if they try hard enough for long enough, they can get their “stolen” land back.

In 2006, a coalition of mostly “moderate” Israeli Arab intellectuals put together a document called “The Future Vision of the Palestinian Arabs in Israel.” It calls for the state  to “acknowledge responsibility for the nakba,” for the Arabs to be treated as an indigenous national group in accordance with international conventions, for them to have equal representation in the Knesset with a veto power. Resources such as land and money must be distributed equally. All forms of “ethnic superiority” – that is, all aspects of the state that make it a Jewish state must be eliminated, such as the flag, national anthem, and so forth. The “Islamic holy sites” – that is, all the Jewish holy sites that the Arabs claim are Islamic – should be under Muslim control. Israel must “acknowledge the right of the Palestinian Arabs in Israel of social, religious, cultural and national continuity with the rest of the Palestinian people and the Arab and Islamic Nation.” There’s much more.

Needless to say, Israel is not prepared to volunteer to give up the idea of a Jewish state in favor of a binational one. And these are the “moderates.”

Nobody in Jewish Israel wants to say that the ideal of coexistence with the 20% of our population that are Arabs is unobtainable, that we are getting farther away from it as time goes by rather than closer. But that’s how it seems today.

This brings me to the following question: was Kahane right when he said that coexistence was impossible? And if he was right, is there a way to keep a Jewish state other than by encouraging the Arabs to leave – by whatever means necessary?

This entry was posted in Israeli Arabs. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Was Kahane right?

  1. Gary Aminoff says:

    Kahana was right. I thought so at the time but knew that politically nothing could be done about it. He wanted to offer financial incentives. Payments to the Arabs to compensate them for their property and for leaving. I think that should be seriously considered by Israel today. Give Arabs in Judea and Samaria the opportunity to take a payment and move to an Arab country with funds to buy a new home in their new country. I think many might do that. I would also think it should be offered to Arabs in Israel, but there might be fewer takers there. They will not be able to maintain the same lifestyle in an Arab country, and most would want to stay in Israel where they have it much better than they would in any Arab country.

  2. MrCohen says:

    Victor Rosenthal asked:

    Was Kahane right when he said that coexistence was impossible?

    my personal response:

    Islam’s most sacred writings – the Koran and Hadiths – are filled with genocidal hate against all non-Muslims, but most of all, against Jews.

    The Koran, chapter 5, verse 82, teaches that Jews are “the worst enemies of Muslims.” Listen carefully to what the Koran is saying: not merely that Jews are enemies of Muslims, but that Jews are THE WORST ENEMIES of Muslims.

    How can there be peaceful coexistence between Muslims and Jews when the Koran claims that Jews are THE WORST ENEMIES of Muslims?

    This is just ONE example of hate against Jews in Islam’s most sacred writings; there are many others, that I do not have the time or patience to write about now.

    Victor Rosenthal asked:

    “And if he was right, is there a way to keep a Jewish state other than by encouraging the Arabs to leave – by whatever means necessary?”

    my personal response:

    In the Biblical Book of Joshua (chapter 13, verse 1) G*D rebuked the prophet Joshua for failing to conquer the entire Land of Israel for the nation of Israel – a conquest which included expelling of all the Caananite inhabitants of the land, or killing them.

    In the next five (5) verses, G*D tells Joshua exactly which pieces of land remain to be conquered.

    Every word and every sentence of the Biblical Book of Joshua has been part of the Jewish faith for 33 centuries, and will continue to be a permanent part of the Jewish faith forever.

    The Babylonian Talmud, tractate Megillah, page 14A, explains that ONLY prophecies that were needed for future generations were recorded in the Bible. Since Joshua chapter 13 was recorded in the Bible, this implies that ALL generations of Jews must learn from it.

    Furthermore, the Biblical Book of Ezekiel (chapters 44 to 46, with classic Jewish commentaries) teaches that the messiah will increase the size of the land of Israel by conquering more lands.

    Ancient Rabbis taught that in the era of the messiah, the land of Israel will include both sides of the Jordan River.

    The concept of giving away the land-of-Israel in exchange for peace with Gentiles is NEVER mentioned in: the Bible, or the Jerusalem Talmud, or Babylonian Talmud, or the writings of Maimonides, or the Code of Jewish Law and its commentaries, or any ancient Jewish book, because it is a gross violation of the Jewish faith.

  3. Paul Flikier says:

    Kahane was definitely right; you don’t need to find a biblical historical explanation, there’s a fact you can not discuss and is that the muslims in general are completely irrational, there is no way of getting to make a muslim rational and get him into logical thinking. Their IQ is much lower than the rest of the world population and there’s no cure for stupidity. When you can not get in accordance with another person from irrationality, you loose all reasonable logical way to be able to set a discussion and solution. So Kahane could not be more right in his opinion.
    I wish there was a scientific study that would determine the reason for the muslim irrationality. There should probably be a chemical, genetic or molecular explanation for this.

  4. MrCohen says:

    Mohammed’s last words before he died:

    “O Lord, kill the Jews and Christians.”

    SOURCE: Hadith Malik, 511:1588

    EXPLANATION: Islam teaches that Mohammed’s
    later teachings take priority over his older teachings.
    Therefore, the later the teaching, the greater it is.
    Therefore, Muslims must believe that Mohammed’s
    last words were his most important words.

    Hadith is a major Islamic holy book, like the Koran.

    QUESTION: How can there be real peace between
    Muslims and Jews, when Mohammed’s last words before
    he died, which are his most important words according
    to Islam, express a desire that Jews should be killed?

  5. MrCohen says:

    Selling a House to a Jew is a Betrayal of Allah
    by Khaled Abu Toameh, 2016 June 20


    PS: How can Muslims permit Jews to have
    an entire country of their own, when permitting Jews
    to have even one house is “a betrayal of Allah”?

  6. MrCohen says:


    ***** QUOTE 1: *****

    “The Koran, unlike the Bible, calls for a political movement for which all Muslims must fight, kill, and subjugate those of other faiths until Islam rules the world.”

    SOURCE: They Must Be Stopped: Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It (chapter 1, page 24) by Brigitte Gabriel, year 2010,
    St. Martin’s Press, 288 pages, ISBN 0312571283, ISBN 9780312571283.

    *****QUOTE 2: *****

    “Many Islamic practices, such as fasting, tithing, daily prayers, and profession of faith, have much in common with Christianity and Judaism.

    However, what makes Islam different from other religions is its call to kill and subjugate all other members of other faiths.

    The terrorist of today as well as imams in mosques throughout the world are calling for the deaths of millions of people around the world in the name of Islam.

    They are calling for jihad against the infidels, citing suras and verses from the Koran and Hadith to support their call to action.”

    SOURCE: They Must Be Stopped: Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It (chapter 1, page 20) by Brigitte Gabriel, year 2010,
    St. Martin’s Press, 288 pages, ISBN 0312571283, ISBN 9780312571283.

    *****QUOTE 3: *****

    “Westerners come from a Judeo-Christian background, where the teaching of faith centers on love, tolerance, and forgiveness. They do not understand that the sword of Islam represents: hatred, intolerance, murder, and the subjugation of anyone not Muslim.”

    SOURCE: They Must Be Stopped: Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It (chapter 1, page 13) by Brigitte Gabriel, year 2010,
    St. Martin’s Press, 288 pages, ISBN 0312571283, ISBN 9780312571283.

  7. MrCohen says:

    Ayaan Hirsi Ali (an ex-Muslim) said on 2009 March 21:

    “Islam is NOT a religion of peace.

    It is a political theory of conquest that seeks domination by any means it can.

    Every accommodation of Muslim demands leads to a sense of euphoria
    and a conviction that Allah is on their side.

    They see every act of appeasement as an invitation to make fresh demands.”

    Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a Muslim-born Somalian-born
    former Member of the Dutch Parliament, born in 1969.

Comments are closed.