Film Review: “Hate Spaces: The Politics of Intolerance on Campus”

“Hate Spaces” is a documentary film (view the trailer here) produced by Ralph Avi Goldwasser and Americans for Peace and Tolerance, who also gave us “The J Street Challenge,” and as the full title suggests, it describes the recent surge of anti-Jewish and anti-Israel activity on American university campuses.

I’ve written about the phenomenon more than once, so I didn’t expect to be surprised by anything in the film. But despite knowing about the various incidents described, the sheer volume and intensity of them taken together left me shaken. Yes, shaken, and I’m not easy to shake.

I was an academic for a short time some decades ago, and the combination of ideological intensity and insulation from the real world that characterizes many students and faculty is not entirely unfamiliar to me, but I couldn’t have imagined that it would focus this way, on one group and one target – my people and my country.

Student activism has always centered around freedom, anti-authoritarianism, opposition to oppression of minorities and support for civil rights, especially free speech. What is happening on campuses is that these principles are being twisted so that the outcome, rather than a reduction in oppression and increased human rights, is the intimidation, marginalization, silencing and even persecution of Jewish and (especially) pro-Israel students.

Although only a few incidents of physical violence have been reported, psychological and academic pressure is widespread, and pro-Israel speech by students or invited speakers is disrupted – or restricted due to fear of disruption.

Multiculturalist political correctness has criminalized any speech critical of blacks, women, gender minorities, Muslims and almost every identifiable group – except Jews or Israelis. It is possible to say absolutely anything about Israel, accuse the IDF, the country or her people of the worst imaginable crimes – child murder, rape, organ theft, forced sterilization of minorities, even genocide – with absolutely zero proof or even evidence. It is possible to claim that Jews control the media and conspire to twist the international financial system to their own benefit, to say that Jews are responsible for black slavery and today’s racism in America, to accuse Israel of teaching American police how to shoot innocent black people. But woe be to one who asks a person with Asian features where she is from or uses the wrong gender pronoun to refer to a transgendered or ‘queer’ individual.

Anti-Zionism and Jew-hatred are closely associated, and the former often slides quickly into the latter. In any event, the distinction is impossible to maintain in the face of the glaring double standard that is applied to Israel, compared to any other nation on earth. Israel is treated like the Jew among nations because it is a nation of Jews.

Much of the anti-Jewish agitation comes from the group Students for Justice in Palestine, which exists on more than 200 campuses across the nation. SJP is funded by student activities funds, no differently than a student dance group or newspaper, and also receives outside contributions. It is closely tied to groups like the Muslim Students Association, CAIR and others, some of which have documented connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and other terrorist groups.

The membership of SJP includes the hard anti-Israel Left, foreign students (many of them Muslims) who grew up in places where Jews and Israel are demonized, and minority students who have been persuaded that their own struggles for a place in society will be enhanced by an alliance with other “oppressed peoples,” such as Palestinian Arabs. This argument has been very successful, especially with blacks, with the Movement for Black Lives including anti-Israel material in its manifesto. The echo chamber effect soon amplifies extremist ideologies, and mob mentality produces extreme behavior.

Their faculty supporters, steeped in the left-wing ideology that permeates academic life and often wedded to the post-colonial paradigm (by which the world is divided into colonizers and colonized, and the colonized have an unlimited right to “resist” by any means), also encourage extreme expressions of hatred for Israel, and by extension, Jews. Departments of ethnic and gender studies, since they are political by nature, are particularly active in promoting anti-Israel themes. Middle East Studies departments, often funded by Arab countries or Iran, are pleased to join the party.

University administrators by and large seem to be pathologically afraid of confrontation and do their best to pretend that nothing is going on until forced to take action, and even then often support the “rights” of disruptive students to disrupt. Attacks on Jews and Israel, no matter how false or outrageous, are justified by appeals to free speech or academic freedom; but other forms of bigotry are punished harshly (faculty members may be dismissed and student organizations suspended).

The film makes it clear that the antisemitic movement – that’s what it is – on campuses is well-financed, well-organized and very successful in gaining adherents. It is also becoming more extreme and more explicitly anti-Jewish as time goes by and the “Overton Window” shifts in the direction that favors anti-Jewish expression. What was beyond the pale yesterday becomes the conventional wisdom today.

Although the film mentions some pro-Israel organizations that are pushing against the trend, they are outnumbered and hampered by being continually on the defensive. Wall Street Journal writer Bret Stephens notes that it is much harder to prove that an atrocity did not happen than to say that it did.

The film does not try to provide a solution. Although there are some campuses with a large percentage of Jews where it should be possible to organize a resistance movement, even there it is difficult, because many Jewish students have internalized the hate-Israel viewpoint. In some cases they are even leaders of the anti-Israel organizations (the film highlights the particularly obnoxious example of Max Geller, a student at Northeastern University).

“Hate Spaces” will premiere in New York on November 30, and will be shown in numerous venues after that. Watching it won’t be a pleasant experience, but definitely an educational one. “Know your enemy” is still good advice.

This entry was posted in Academia, American Jews, American society, Jew Hatred. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Film Review: “Hate Spaces: The Politics of Intolerance on Campus”

  1. Keefe Goldfisher says:

    The failure of ordinary Americans to fight for their liberties, to increasingly self-censure and ignore the country’s laws, actively repudiate and wage war on one’s own culture–this is the sine qua non for the absence of will that allows BDS, anti-Semitism, radical Islam, Black Lives Matter, anti-Trump rioting, anti-police violence, cultural splintering by identity group, grievance mongering, religion-bashing… and a whole host of other isms, ings and ites to flourish in the most vulnerable areas of society… like schools. It is a huge operation at the margins to bring down the whole of American society in steadily mounting nuisance attacks to sap the host’s strength.

    One gets a window into this Orwellian world, even without this film you’re reviewing, by looking at Europe now, where, save for the UK, all of the continent acquiesces to the depredations of Islamism (and this too applies to Britain) to the point that lawful behavior is criminalized and outrageous and criminal behavior is pardoned, ignored or endorsed. And the fate of the Jews suffers for the overall inability to protect culture. How is it that Muslim immigrants swamped these countries against the will of each native population and not a single government has fallen since? How is that Geert Wilders stands trial for asking a question about the quantity of Moroccans in Holland? Why do the French allow Muslims to form a country within their France? How can a man die for drawing a cartoon or directing a film?

    Trump represents the beginning of the American pushback, but there are at least 3 1/2 generations since WWII of US students propagandized by tenured ideologues and vulnerable by overactive guilt and the constant neglect of the small compromises they have made that surely did not at the time seem strong enough to swamp the whole American enterprise, but taken together, have started to accumulate towards that effect. Think of how just 8 years of Obama has given so much momentum to this descent, and how close we came to having another 8 years of reinforcement to it. Why must we come so close to the peril of losing our Constitution and melting-pot unity?

    When a proud culture repudiates its enemies and critics out of the conviction of its superior government and culture and will not harbor them, anti-Semitism cannot survive… because there is no group large enough to give credence and cover to anti-Semitism’s purveyors.

Comments are closed.